Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and risk of stroke, hospitalized bleeding and death in Medicare beneficiaries.

PURPOSE: Among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), a nonpharmacologic option (e.g., percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion [LAAO]) is needed for patients with oral anticoagulant (OAC) contraindications. Among beneficiaries in the Medicare fee-for-service coverage 20% sample databases (2015-18) who had AF and an elevated CHA2DS2-VASc score, we assessed the association between percutaneous LAAO versus OAC use and risk of stroke, hospitalized bleeding, and death. METHODS: Patients undergoing percutaneous LAAO were matched to up to five OAC users by sex, age, date of enrollment, index date, CHA2DS2-VASc score, and HAS-BLED score. Overall, 17 156 patients with AF (2905 with percutaneous LAAO) were matched (average ± SD 78 ± 6 years, 44% female). Cox proportional hazards model were used. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 10.3 months. After multivariable adjustments, no significant difference for risk of stroke or death was noted when patients with percutaneous LAAO were compared with OAC users (HRs [95% CIs]: 1.14 [0.86-1.52], 0.98 [0.86-1.10]). There was a 2.94-fold (95% CI: 2.50-3.45) increased risk for hospitalized bleeding for percutaneous LAAO compared with OAC use. Among patients 65 to <78 years old, those undergoing percutaneous LAAO had higher risk of stroke compared with OAC users. No association was present in those ≥78 years. CONCLUSION: In this analysis of real-world AF patients, percutaneous LAAO versus OAC use was associated with similar risk of death, nonsignificantly elevated risk of stroke, and an elevated risk of bleeding in the post-procedural period. Overall, these results support results of randomized trials that percutaneous LAAO may be an alternative to OAC use for patients with contraindications.

Evaluating the effectiveness of echocardiographic guidance in diminishing postoperative wound complications for left atrial appendage closure: A clinical retrospective study.

Echocardiographic guidance in left atrial appendage (LAA) closure procedures is increasingly recognized for its potential to enhance patient outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF). This retrospective study assesses its impact on hospital stay duration, readmission rates and surgical site wound complications in 200 AF patients. Divided equally into an echocardiographically guided group (Group E) and a non-guided group (Group N), the analysis focused on detailed patient data encompassing hospital stay, 30-day readmission and wound complications. Findings revealed that Group E experienced a significantly shorter average hospital stay of 3.5 days, compared with 6.5 days in Group N, along with a lower 30-day readmission rate (5% vs. 18% in Group N). Furthermore, Group E showed a considerable reduction in surgical site wound complications, such as infections and hematomas. The study concludes that echocardiographic guidance in LAA closure procedures markedly improves postoperative wound outcomes, underscoring its potential as a standard practice in cardiac surgeries for AF patients. This approach not only optimizes patient safety and postoperative recovery but also enhances healthcare resource utilization.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation With or Without Left Atrial Appendage Ligation in Atrial Fibrillation: The aMAZE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Left atrial appendage elimination may improve catheter ablation outcomes for atrial fibrillation. Objective: To assess the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous left atrial appendage ligation adjunctive to catheter pulmonary vein isolation for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous left atrial appendage ligation adjunctive to planned pulmonary vein isolation for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation present for less than 3 years. Eligible patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to undergo left atrial appendage ligation and pulmonary vein isolation or pulmonary vein isolation alone. Use of a 2:1 randomization ratio was intended to provide more device experience and safety data. Patients were enrolled from October 2015 to December 2019 at 53 US sites, with the final follow-up visit on April 21, 2021. Interventions: Left atrial appendage ligation plus pulmonary vein isolation compared with pulmonary vein isolation alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: A bayesian adaptive analysis was used for primary end points. Primary effectiveness was freedom from documented atrial arrythmias of greater than 30 seconds duration 12 months after undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Rhythm was assessed by Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months after pulmonary vein isolation, symptomatic event monitoring, or any electrocardiographic tracing obtained through 12 months after pulmonary vein isolation. Primary safety was a composite of predefined serious adverse events compared with a prespecified 10% performance goal 30 days after the procedure. Left atrial appendage closure was evaluated through 12 months after pulmonary vein isolation. Results: Overall, 404 patients were randomized to undergo left atrial appendage ligation plus pulmonary vein isolation and 206 were randomized to undergo pulmonary vein isolation alone. Primary effectiveness was 64.3% with left atrial appendage ligation and pulmonary vein isolation and 59.9% with pulmonary vein isolation only (difference, 4.3% [bayesian 95% credible interval, -4.2% to 13.2%]; posterior superiority probability, 0.835), which did not meet the statistical criterion to establish superiority (0.977). Primary safety was met, with a 30-day serious adverse event rate of 3.4% (bayesian 95% credible interval, 2.0% to 5.0%; posterior probability, 1.0) which was less than the prespecified threshold of 10%. At 12 months after pulmonary vein isolation, complete left atrial appendage closure (0 mm residual communication) was observed in 84% of patients and less than or equal to 5 mm residual communication was observed in 99% of patients. Conclusions and Relevance: Percutaneous left atrial appendage ligation adjunctive to pulmonary vein isolation did not meet prespecified efficacy criteria for freedom from atrial arrhythmias at 12 months compared with pulmonary vein isolation alone for patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation, but met prespecified safety criteria and demonstrated high rates of closure at 12 months. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02513797.

The progress of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: A bibliometric analysis from 1994 to 2022.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, affecting 32 million individuals worldwide. Although atrial fibrillation has been studied for decades, a comprehensive analysis using bibliometrics has not been performed for atrial fibrillation-left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Therefore, we analyzed the scientific outputs of global LAAO research and explored the current research status and hotpots from 1994 to 2022. METHODS: We searched the Web of Science core collection for publications related to LAAO that were published between 1994 and 2022. We then performed bibliometric analysis and visualization using Microsoft Excel 2021, Bibliometric (https://bibliometric.com), VOSviewer (version 1.6.19), CiteSpace (version 6.2. R2), and the Bibliometrix 4.0.0 Package (https://www.bibliometrix.org) based on the R language were used to perform the bibliometric analysis, trend and emerging foci of LAAO in the past 29 years, including author, country, institution, journal distribution, article citations, and keywords. In total, we identified 1285 eligible publications in the field of LAAO, with an increasing trend in the annual number of publications. RESULTS: The United States is the country with the most published articles in this field, while the United Kingdom is the country with the most cited literature. Mayo Clinic, from the United States, has the most publications in this area and Horst Sievert from Germany had the highest number of individual publications. The analysis of keywords showed that fibrillation, stroke, safety, oral anticoagulants, and watchman were the main hotpots and frontier directions of LAAO. Surgical treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, upgrading of related surgical instruments, and anticoagulation regimen after surgical treatment are the major research frontiers. CONCLUSION: We show that the research of percutaneous LAAO has been increasing rapidly over the last decade. Our aim was to overview past studies in the field of LAAO, to grasp the frame of LAAO research, and identify new perspectives for future research.

Should left atrial appendage closure be considered in resistant left atrial appendage thrombus cases? 'Former Foe, New Ally'.

BACKGROUND: The study explores left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) as a safe and effective alternative to anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high bleeding risk. Complications, such as cardioembolic events due to left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT), highlight the need for alternative stroke prevention strategies. AIMS: This research assesses LAAC's safety and efficacy in patients with LAAT, aiming to offer valuable insights into its potential as a viable option for stroke prevention in such cases. METHODS: The study included 205 patients who underwent LAAC using specific devices between September 2015 and February 2023. Among them, 32 patients had persistent LAAT. Baseline characteristics, antithrombotic medications, risk scores, and LAAC indications were documented. Patients were followed to monitor significant clinical events like stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The mean age was 71.9 and mostly female. Indications for LAAC were ischemic cerebrovascular events (CVE) despite anticoagulation (25%), bleeding complications (major/minor, 37.5% each), or both. Successful LAA closure was achieved in all cases, with minimal pericardial effusion in one. One-month follow-up showed no major events or device-related issues. Median follow-up of 16.5 months saw 21.9% non-cardiac deaths. The study underscores LAAC's efficacy for stroke prevention in patients with persistent LAAT. CONCLUSIONS: The LAAC in cases of LAAT, whether pursued initially or as a deferred approach, demonstrates feasibility and safety, exhibiting notable procedural success and minimal incidence of periprocedural complications.

Epicardial left atrial appendage clipping versus direct oral anticoagulant to reduce stroke risk in non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (LAA-CLIP): rationale, design and study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing globally, and stroke prevention is the key to reduce the morbidity and mortality related to AF. Currently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the primary options for stroke prevention, while it increases risk of bleeding. Left atrial appendage (LAA) is suspected as a vital source of cerebral emboli and may lead to ischaemic stroke, and thoracoscopic LAA clipping procedure provides an alternative option for stroke prevention in high-risk patients. However, high-quality evidence comparing LAA clipping to DOACs in terms of stroke prevention is lacking. This trial is designed to assess whether the efficacy of thoracoscopic LAA clipping is superior to DOACs for stroke prevention in AF patients at high risk of thrombosis (CHA2DS2-VASc≥2 in men and ≥3 in women)[CHA2DS2-VASc stands for "congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 (doubled), diabetes, stroke (doubled), vascular disease, age 65 to 74 and sex category (female)"]. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, multicentre, open-labelled, randomised controlled study. This trial will randomly assign 290 patients with non-paroxysmal AF to thoracoscopic LAA clipping group or DOAC therapy group in a 1:1 randomisation. The primary endpoint is defined as a composite endpoint event consisting of stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, major bleeding events and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events at 24 months after randomisation. The secondary endpoints consist of the components of the primary composite endpoint, surgery-related adverse events and minor bleeding events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The central ethics committee at Fuwai Hospital approved the trial entitled "Epicardial left atrial appendage clipping versus direct oral anticoagulant to reduce stroke risk in non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (LAA-CLIP trial)". The results of this study will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06021808.

[Early to Long-term Results of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Using Clip Device in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation].

Oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation are the standard approach to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, oral anticoagulant therapy carries the risk of cerebral infarction recurrence, not to mention hemorrhagic complications, even under appropriate drug therapy. Surgical treatments targeting the left atrial appendage include left atrial appendage closure( LAAO) and left atrial appendage resection (LAAR). Our hospital uses AtriClip (approved and available in Japan since 2018) as a device for LAAO, and we investigated the early and long-term results of LAAO using AtriClip in our hospital. As a result, stable early to long-term results were expected for left atrial appendage closure using AtriClip device, suggesting that it may be an option that can be considered as a method for preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. But further investigation is required in the future.

[Off-pump Totally-endoscopic Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation].

Off-pump totally-endoscopic surgery for atrial fibrillation is reported. This procedure is also called the Wolf-Ohtsuka procedure or totally thoracoscopic maze (TT-maze) surgery. It is a minimally invasive left atrial appendage management and surgical ablation. The wound is limited to that required for port placement, and the patient recovers quickly. Advantages over WATCHMAN include the that it can be applied regardless of the size of the left atrial appendage, can be performed even if there is a thrombus at the tip of the left atrial appendage, and no wound or device comes on the endocardial side. Advantages over catheter ablation is the potential for embolism prevention by simultaneously performing ablation and the left atrial appendage management. The tips and techniques for this procedure are also described here.

[The Long Outcome of the Left Atrial Appendage Preserving Maze Procedure].

We retrospectively study the outcome of left atrial appendage (LAA) preserving maze procedure, focus on thrombus formation in left atrium( LA), postoperative stroke, and LA function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 131 patients (mean age, 68.2y;77 men and 54 women) who underwent maze procedure for atrial fibrillation( Af) between 2008 and 2020. Full maze was performed for 116 patients with long-standing persistent Af or persistent Af. Pulmonary vein isolation alone was performed for 15 patients with paroxysmal Af. The mean follow-up period was 2.9( 10.1-0.4) years. RESULTS: In perioperative results, there were no death, cerebral infarction, and reoperation in this series. At discharge, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years after the surgery, sinus rhythm was maintained in 92%, 87%, 83%, 77%. Pacemaker was implanted in 8( early 3, late 5) patients. Despite adequate anticoagulant therapy, one patient developed cerebral infarction a month postoperatively. In other patients, there was no cerebral infarction in short-term nor long-term. CONCLUSIONS: The LAA preserving maze procedure was not a risk factor of cerebral infarction under appropriate medication. However, close follow-up is essential.

[Left Atrial Appendage Closure with Various Types of Surgical Technique and Its Results].

BACKGROUND: Occlusion of the left atrial appendage( LAA) may prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. In this study, we reviewed various types of LAA occlusion techniques and results of patients underwent surgical LAA closure. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2022, 182 patients who underwent surgical LAA closure were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: The surgical LAA closure consisted of 90 cases of closure device, AtriCure, 63 cases of surgical excision, 13 cases of stapler excision, 3 cases of ligation, and 13 cases of internal suture ligation. During the follow-up period, there were no deaths owing to cardiogenic emboli and no cerebral infarctions. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the surgical techniques, LAA closure was effective in preventing cardiogenic stroke. The AtriClip is a safe, simple, and effective and thoracoscopic LAA closure using AtriClip is expected as a less-invasive LAA management.

Single antiplatelet therapy following Amplatzer left atrial appendage occlusion.

BACKGROUND: The optimal antithrombotic therapy following left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains debated. Ideally, this therapy should effectively prevent device-related thrombosis (DRT) while minimising the associated bleeding risk. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of a postprocedural single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) strategy following Amplatzer LAAO in a large consecutive cohort. METHODS: This retrospective, single-centre, observational study included all patients discharged on SAPT after LAAO with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) or Amplatzer Amulet between March 2010 and December 2021 at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Baseline, procedural, and imaging data were obtained locally, while clinical outcomes and medication data were extracted from the Danish national health registries. RESULTS: A total of 553 patients underwent Amplatzer LAAO during the specified time frame. Of these, 431 (77.9%) high bleeding risk patients were discharged on SAPT with either acetylsalicylic acid (n=403, 72.9%) or clopidogrel (n=28, 5.1%). At 6 months, 173 (41.7%) patients were not on any antithrombotic therapy. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 3.9±1.5 and 3.4±1.1, respectively. DRT was detected in 6 (1.5%) patients on 8-week follow-up imaging using cardiac computed tomography (n=386, 89.6%) or transoesophageal echocardiography (n=27, 6.3%). The 1-year ischaemic stroke rate was 2.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-4.2). One-year rates for major bleeding and cardiovascular death were 5.9% (95% CI: 4.0-8.9) and 2.9% (95% CI: 1.6-5.1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SAPT following Amplatzer LAAO displayed rates of DRT and stroke comparable to those reported with more intensive antithrombotic regimens. Meanwhile, we observed low rates of major bleeding.

Left atrial appendage occlusion: Percutaneous and surgical approaches in everyday practice.

Prophylactic left atrial appendage occlusion has been suggested as a means of reducing cardioembolism risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Its clinical benefits have been discussed together with potential endocrine or hemodynamic adverse effects, with conflicting conclusions. We aimed to provide a thorough overview of the current literature and a recommendation for daily clinical decision-making. A comprehensive Medline search through PubMed was conducted to search for relevant articles, which were further filtered using the title and abstract. Sixty-five articles were selected as relevant to the topic. Concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery for other reasons is effective in terms of thromboembolism risk reduction in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Surgical occlusion is safe, and epicardial closure techniques are preferred. Thoracoscopic and transcatheter techniques are also feasible, and the individual treatment choice must be tailored to the patient. The concerns about endocrine imbalance or risk of heart failure after occlusion are not supported by evidence. Current evidence is conflicting with regard to hemodynamic consequences of appendage occlusion.

Predicting reduced left atrial appendage velocity from echocardiographic left atrial function parameters in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation.

Decreased left atrial appendage velocity (LAAV) is considered a significant risk factor thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage (LAA). The aim of this study was to assess the role of echocardiographic left atrial (LA) function parameters in predicting LAAV in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing catheter ablation. We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with persistent AF undergoing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) directly before the first AF ablation in 2019-2022. Of the 150 patients enrolled in the study, 29.3% (n = 44) had reduced LAAV values defined as < 25 cm/s. Patients with decreased LAAV values exhibited significantly reduced left atrial reservoir and conduit strain (LASr and LAScd), LA emptying fraction, and average e' values. This group also presented with a high LA stiffness index (LASI), high LA and right atrial area, and high LA volume index (LAVI) and E/e' ratio. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, LASI and LAVI remained significant predictors of the reduced LAAV. The threshold values were 1.6 for LASI and 44.47 ml/m2 for LAVI, with area under the curve values of 0.809 and 0.755, respectively. Among all noninvasive echocardiographic parameters, LASI and LAVI were found to be the best predictors of reduced LAAV, with good sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, LASI was found to be the only significant predictor of reduced LAAV defined as < 20 cm/s as well as < 25 cm/s.

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous Watchman 2.5 device versus Amplatzer Amulet for left atrial appendage closure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and study-level meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), mechanical occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) using a permanently implanted device may be an effective alternative to oral anti-coagulants (OAC). To facilitate left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), multiple percutaneous devices have been proposed. Watchman Generation 2.5 and Amplatzer Amulet are the two most popular used devices for preventing stroke in patients with NVAF. We sought to compare safety and efficacy outcomes between Watchman 2.5 and Amplatzer Amulet in patients undergoing LAAC procedure. METHODS: We carried out a comprehensive and systematic search of the databases PubMed and Scopus, for all studies that compared the safety and efficacy of Watchman 2.5 and Amplatzer Amulet devices, from inception, till June 2023. We performed the statistical analysis using Review Manager (V.5.4.1 Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom). The safety outcomes of interest included device success, device-related thrombus, device embolization perioperatively and at follow-up, perioperative pericardial perfusion events, and perioperative cardiac tamponade events. Efficacy outcomes were all-cause mortality perioperatively and at follow-up, cardiovascular (CV) mortality at follow-up, stroke, major and minor bleeding events at follow-up, transient ischemic attack (TIA) in follow-up period, thromboembolic events in follow-up period, and peri-device leakage in perioperative period. All data was analysed using a random-effects model, and presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). RESULTS: Regarding safety outcomes, device success was non-significantly reduced in Watchman group when compared with Amulet (RR 0.99, p = 0.57; I2 = 34%). In contrast, device-related thrombus was non-significantly increased in Watchman 2.5 group in comparison to Amulet (RR 1.44, p = 0.11; I2 = 0%). There was no significant difference between the devices in terms of device embolization in the perioperative (RR 0.36, p = 0.38; I2 = 22%) and follow-up (RR 2.24, p = 0.13; I2 = 0%) periods. Likewise, there was no significant difference in the risks of pericardial effusion (RR 0.98, p = 0.98; I2 = 0%), and cardiac tamponade (RR 0.65, p = 0.76; I2 = 62%) perioperatively. Regarding efficacy outcomes, no significant difference was observed in all-cause mortality between devices perioperatively (RR 0.51, p = 0.32; I2 = 0%) and at follow-up (RR 1.08, p = 0.56; I2 = 0%). CV-mortality was non-significantly reduced in Watchman group when compared with Amulet (RR 0.57, p = 0.20; I2 = 0%). The Amulet device was not superior to the Watchman device in terms of stroke at follow-up (RR 1.13, p = 0.63; I2 = 0%). Sub-group analysis showed comparable ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke events between two devices. Furthermore, at follow-up, there was no significant difference in major (RR 1.06, p = 0.63; I2 = 0%) and minor bleeding events (RR 1.81, p = 0.17; I2 = 0%) between the two devices. No difference was observed for trans-ischemic attack (RR 1.89, p = 0.24; I2 = 0%) and thromboembolic events (RR 0.96, p = 0.96; I2 = 0%) at follow-up. No significant difference was observed between devices for peri-device leakage in perioperative period (RR 2.16, p = 0.05; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: The data suggested that LAAC is safe and efficacious procedure irrespective of device used, with generally low complication rates. Watchman generation 2.5 remains non-superior to Amplatzer Amulet in terms of safety and efficacy outcomes.

Characteristics and outcome of patients with left atrial appendage closure in China: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Clinical characteristics and long-term data on the safety and efficacy of LAAC in preventing cerebrovascular accident and thromboembolism among Chinese patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF) remain limited. METHODS: Data of consecutive NVAF patients who underwent LAAC at Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, from June 1, 2014, to December 31, 2021, were collected and analyzed retrospectively. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the composite endpoint of stroke/transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, and death from cardiovascular causes. The primary safety endpoint is the severe bleeding defined by the LAAC Munich consensus. RESULTS: Of the 222 patients enrolled, the mean age was 66.90 ± 9.62 years, with a majority being male (77.03%). Many patients are non-paroxysmal AF (71.19%) with a median duration of AF of 4.00 years. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.78 ± 1.49, and the mean HAS-BLED score was 1.68 ± 0.86. Thromboembolic events (76.58%) were the most common indication for LAAC. The device, technical, and procedural success rates were 98.65%, 98.65%, and 93.69%, respectively. The anticoagulation continuation rate was 56.36%, 31.25%, and 22.60% at 3-, 6- and 12 months post-procedure, respectively. Throughout a mean 2.81 years of follow-up, the incidence of the primary efficacy endpoint was 4.27 per 100 patient-years, predominantly attributable to stroke/TIA (3.12 per 100 PYs). Five patients experienced major bleeding during the follow-up period. Post-procedure imaging revealed minimal complications, with only one substantial peri-device leak. Device-related thrombus occurred in 2.33% of patients, resolving with anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that LAAC is a safe and effective alternative option for Chinese patients with AF, with a high success rate, few complications as well as fewer long-term adverse outcome events.

In-hospital safety outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion in octogenarians and nonagenarians.

AIMS: Data on safety outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in elderly patients are limited. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of LAAO between octogenarians (age 80-89) and nonagenarians (age ≥90) vs. younger patients (age ≤79). METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample database to identify patients hospitalized for LAAO from 2016 to 2020 and to compare in-hospital safety outcomes in octogenarians and nonagenarians vs. younger patients. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital all-cause mortality or stroke. Secondary outcomes included procedural complications, length of stay (LOS), and total costs. Outcomes were determined using logistic regression models. Among 84 140 patients hospitalized for LAAO, 32.9% were octogenarians, 2.8% were nonagenarians, and 64.3% were ≤79 years of age. Over the study period, the volume of LAAO increased in all age groups (all Ptrend < 0.01). After adjustment for clinical and demographic factors, octogenarians and nonagenarians had similar odds of in-hospital all-cause mortality or stroke [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-2.13 for octogenarians; aOR 1.69, 95% CI 0.67-3.92 for nonagenarians], cardiac tamponade, acute kidney injury, major bleeding, and blood transfusion, in addition to similar LOS and total costs compared with younger patients (all P > 0.05). However, octogenarians and nonagenarians had higher odds of vascular complications compared with younger patients (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.08-1.99 for octogenarians; aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.18-2.97 for nonagenarians). CONCLUSION: Octogenarians and nonagenarians undergoing LAAO have a similar safety profile compared with clinically similar younger patients except for higher odds of vascular complications.

A rare case of an unexpected trigger of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the right atrial appendage diverticulum.

INTRODUCTION: We described a rare case of an adolescent girl with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation originating from the right atrial appendage diverticulum and successfully converted to sinus rhythm after surgical intervention. METHODS: A 19-year-old girl was referred to the hospital for a catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. conventional radiofrequency ablation using 3-D mapping were ineffective. Activation mapping showed the root of the free wall atrial appendage was first excited and catheter modeling (3D Carto map) showed a sac-like structure. RESULTS: We did selective angiography and further Computed tomography angiography (CTA) and Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) which showed diverticulum originating from the right atrial appendage. Hence the patient was referred to cardiac surgery and had no recurrent atrial fibrillation at three months postoperative follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Right atrial appendage diverticulum was an extremely rare malformation that can coexist with atrial tachyarrhythmia. Surgical ligation or excision of the abnormal structure with local ablation can achieve excellent results.

Efectividad y seguridad de una estrategia de antiagregación plaquetaria simple tras cierre percutáneo de orejuela izquierda en pacientes con FA / Single antiplatelet therapy after left atrial appendage closure in patients with AF: safety and effectiveness

Introduction and objectives The optimal antithrombotic strategy following left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is poorly defined in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. We assessed the safety and effectiveness of a single antiplatelet treatment (SAPT) strategy after LAAC in a population at high risk of ischemic and bleeding events. Methods This single-center, observational, prospective study included a consecutive cohort of patients who underwent LAAC using the LAmbre device (Lifetech Scientific, China) and who were discharged with SAPT. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, and device-related thrombosis during follow-up. Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality and major bleeding events (BARC ≥3a). Clinical follow-up was performed at 1, 6, and 12 months and subsequently on an annual basis. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed at 1 and 12 months of follow-up. Results The study comprised 74 patients. The median age was 77 [72-83] years and 43% were women. The cohort exhibited a high prevalence of comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors. The median CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4 [3-6] and 4 [4-5], respectively. The median length of follow-up was 2.5 years (188 patients-year). During follow-up, device-related thrombosis occurred in 3 patients (4%). Ischemic stroke occurred in 1 patient (1.3%, rate 0.5%/y), representing a 90.9% relative risk reduction compared with the risk predicted by CHA2DS2-VASc. Major bleeding events occurred in 12 patients (16%, 6.4%/y), with a relative risk reduction of 26.4% of that predicted by HAS-BLED. Cardiovascular-related mortality was observed in 2 patients (2.7%). Conclusions SAPT appears to be a safe and effective treatment following LAAC in patients at high ischemic and hemorrhagic risk. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings (AU)

Introducción y objetivos Se desconoce cuál es la terapia antitrombótica óptima tras el cierre percutáneo de la orejuela izquierda (CPOI) en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar la efectividad y la seguridad de un régimen de tratamiento antiagregante plaquetario simple (TAPS) tras el CPOI en una población con alto riesgo isquémico y hemorrágico. Métodos Estudio observacional prospectivo que incluyó una cohorte consecutiva de pacientes a los que se realizó CPOI con dispositivo LAmbre (Lifetech Scientific, China) y que recibieron TAPS al alta. El evento primario fue un combinado de ictus, embolia sistémica y trombosis del dispositivo. Los eventos secundarios fueron mortalidad cardiovascular y hemorragia mayor (BARC ≥ 3a). Se realizó seguimiento clínico al mes y a los 6 y 12 meses y cada año después. Se realizó ecocardiograma transesofágico al mes y a los 12 meses. Resultados Se incluyó a 74 pacientes (el 43% mujeres) con una mediana de edad de 77 [intervalo intercuartílico, 72-83] años, que presentaban gran comorbilidad y factores de riesgo cardiovascular. Los valores de CHA2DS2-VASc y HAS-BLED fueron una mediana de 4 [3-6] y 4 [4-5] respectivamente. Durante el seguimiento (mediana, 2,5 años), 3 pacientes (4%) presentaron trombosis del dispositivo. Uno sufrió ictus isquémico (1,3%, 0,5%/año), lo que supone, según la incidencia esperada por CHA2DS2-VASc, una reducción del riesgo relativo del 90,9%. Sufrieron eventos hemorrágicos 12 pacientes (16%; 6,4%/año), una tasa el 26,4% menor que el riesgo HAS-BLED predicho. Se produjo la muerte cardiovascular de 2 pacientes (2,7%). Conclusiones Una estrategia de TAPS tras el CPOI parece ser una opción efectiva y segura para los pacientes con altos riesgos isquémico y hemorrágico. Se necesitan más estudios que corroboren nuestros resultados (AU)

Long-term outcomes of left atrial appendage closure with or without concomitant pulmonary vein isolation:a propensity score matching analysis based on CLACBAC study.

BACKGROUND: The combined procedure of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with concomitant pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has demonstrated its efficacy and safety. However, there is still a lack of comparative investigations regarding the long-term benefits of the combined procedure when compared to LAAC alone. Our study aims to assess the long-term outcomes of combined procedure of LAAC with concomitant PVI in comparison with a propensity matched LAAC alone group. METHODS: Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to rectify covariate imbalances, resulting in the inclusion of 153 comparable patients from the initial cohort of 333 non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Clinical outcomes, encompassing thrombotic events, major cardiocerebrovascular adverse events (MACCE), re-hospitalization due to cardiovascular disease (CVD), and atrial tachycardia (AT), were juxtaposed between the two groups. Bleeding events and peri-device complications, such as residual flow, device-related thrombus, and device replacement, were also compared. Additionally, a patients group underwent PVI alone was included for comparing AF recurrence rates between the PVI alone group and the combined group. RESULTS: Following PSM, 153 patients (mean age 70.3 ± 8.9, 62.7% men) were included, with 102 undergoing the combined procedure and 51 undergoing LAAC alone. No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The mean follow-up time was 37.6 ± 7.9 months, and two patients were lost to follow-up in the combined procedure group. Thrombotic events were observed in 4 (7.8%) patients in the LAAC alone group and 4 (4.0%) in the combined group (Log-rank p = 0.301). The proportion of patients experiencing MACCE, re-hospitalization due to CVD, and AT between the two groups was comparable, as were bleeding events and peri-device complications. Among patients from the combined procedure group without AF recurrence, a significant difference was noted in prior-procedure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LVEF at the 12th month after the procedure (57.2% ± 7.1% vs. 60.5% ± 6.5%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The concomitant PVI and LAAC procedure did not increase procedure-related complications, nor did it confer significant benefits in preventing thrombotic events or reducing other cardiovascular events. However, the combined procedure improved heart function, suggesting potential long-term benefits.